Angara Cluster Floral Diamond XO Bracelet in Yellow Gold bkA6Ke

SKU5958574
Angara Cluster Floral Diamond XO Bracelet in Yellow Gold bkA6Ke
Angara Cluster Floral Diamond XO Bracelet in Yellow Gold

Live Now: CTV News Channel

HOT TOPICS Angara Three Prong Set Diamond Stud Earrings in Platinum 0M3kg
Murder Trump tariffs
Charmed Memories Olaf Frozen Charm Sterling Silver nIfqMW7Ka

In addition to thanking the men and women of the armed forces for their service, Trump gave a shoutout to several PGA Tour players in attendance, including Phil Mickelson, Keegan Bradley, John Daly and Bubba Watson.

“I like Phil," Trump said, "and Phil, I think, likes me."

The president - and LPGA players over the years - also praised their physical and mental fitness.

"These are unbelievably talented people. They’re talented in their mind and in their body,” Trump said. “Their muscles are strong but their mind has to be stronger. It’s tough. And these are tough people.”

Trump has a lot on his plate these days - including selecting a nominee for the Supreme Court on July 9 - but he said he plans to watch the coverage this weekend at the White House.

"I'll be sitting home at the White House," he said, "and I'll be watching and saying 'I wish I could play like that.'"

Article Tags: President Donald Trump, Phil Mickelson, Bubba Watson, Zales Diamond Accent Puffed Disc Necklace in Sterling Silver and 18K Gold Plate eqn2yeH

Trending

Dahmen: 'Kang cheated' in final round

Dahmen calls out playing partner: 'Kang cheated'

Henderson frustrated, smashes club in half

Dahmen accuses Kang of cheating at Quicken Loans National

Drop the mic: Chamblee aims for Senior Open start

Getty Images
By Doug Ferguson July 4, 2018, 1:06 am

POTOMAC, Md. – Tiger Woods finished the Quicken Loans National with a 66 and was on his way to discuss his performance with the media when he was asked to stop for a few pictures.

That's not unusual.

Except on this occasion, the request came from the guy who had just signed his card.

''He's in my opinion the greatest golfer ever to play, so it was one of my best rounds I've ever played,'' Bronson Burgoon gushed after his round of 67.

Woods posed with Burgoon and his caddie, and then one of Burgoon's friends stepped in for a picture.

Hold on. One more.

Burgoon's wife came over, and Woods delivered another big smile as if they were old friends.

Woods has a lot of new friends this year.

He played the final round of the Honda Classic with Sam Burns, who was born a month before Woods made his professional debut. At the Wells Fargo Championship, he played the final round with Brandon Harkins, a 31-year-old rookie.

Woods spent Saturday on the TPC Potomac at Avenel Farm with Joel Dahmen, who also got a picture with Woods, in the scoring area away from the crowd.

''He made his fourth birdie in a row and I couldn't stop smiling,'' Dahmen said. ''That was the coolest thing ever on a golf course.''

There are no feature groups on the weekend. Pairings are determined strictly by the score. Woods has ended up with a half-dozen players whom he had never met until being introduced on the first tee.

FAST Status: All Systems Go!
Open Mobile Menu
FAST Insights

By: Seth Aldrich, Ph.D.

There are several ways of setting goals for students when progress monitoring, one of the essential components in a Angara ClawSet EmeraldCut Natural Tanzanite Halo Ring in Platinum oaWpxQmk
(MTSS). The ways in which goals are set should be aligned with the questions they address. For example, if our goal (question) is “Can we get the student to perform targeted foundation skills at a level similar to that of his or her grade mates?” we might set a norm referenced goal for the student to perform at the 30 percentile compared to national or local end of year (spring) norms. In FastBridge, scores between the 30 and 85 percentile are indicated by green color coding. One problem with norm-referenced goals is that performance at the 30 percentile might not be enough to be successful. Also, some norm-referenced goals, correspond with insufficient long-term growth when we look at norms for rates of improvement (ROIs which will be explained below). For example, a student performing at the 25 percentile in the fall, who achieves a 30th percentile score (‘average’) by spring, may have made weak growth considering rate of improvement norms and still be considered ‘at risk’ considering criterion targets.

A criterion-referenced goal is one that is set to a specific predetermined level or criterion. Criterion-referenced goals are created by selecting scores that are highly predictive of student success on other assessments. Such goals address the question, “Can we get the student to a proficient level of skills that predict success on other tests (such as a Common Core-aligned state test)?” In the FastBridge data management system, student attainment of a criterion benchmark is indicated by the term ‘low risk.’ In comparison, students whose scores are below the criterion are coded as being either ‘some risk’ or ‘high risk’. Students at some risk are indicated with one exclamation mark (!) next to the score and those at high risk have two exclamation marks (!!). Setting these types of goals can answer important questions, but also have potential flaws. A problem for both norm-referenced and criterion-referenced goals is that they may be associated with rates of improvement (growth) that increase gaps in achievement or are so ambitious that they are rarely achieved or sustained.

An example of an overly ambitious criterion-referenced goal might be if we were to expect a second grade student to go from the 10 percentile on Zales Stackable Expressions 6065mm Cultured Freshwater Pearl Rope Ring in Sterling Silver Fr125wi
in the fall (23 words read correctly), to ‘low risk’ in the spring (106 correctly read words). That student would have to gain 2.3 words per week to achieve that goal (106 goal, minus 23 baseline, divided by 36 instructional weeks from fall to spring, equals 2.3 words per week). When we look at norms for growth rates, this would be well above the 95 percentile, a rate few students ever achieve.

Another alternative is to use rate of improvement (ROI) goals. Educators can set goals in which students “catch up” to their peers, although sometimes over a longer period of time. To achieve a reasonable but ambitious ‘catch up’ goal, a student must improve at a rate stronger than his or her peers. The analogy might be a cross country runner who is behind the average runners and progressing more slowly, needing to accelerate in order to catch up to the group that is ahead and running faster. Educators must be careful, however, that the goals we set for students are not so ambitious that few students would ever achieve them.

Another way to think about ROI-based goals is to compare them to weight gain or loss. For example, say I needed to lose some weight. At my height, 175 pounds is about my ideal weight (a criterion-referenced goal). If my current weight were 250 pounds and I set a criterion-referenced goal to achieve my healthy weight (175 pounds) over the course of 5 months (20 weeks), I would have to lose 3.75 pounds per week. This is calculated by subtracting my goal weight from my current weight and dividing that number by how many weeks until my goal date. Weight loss research suggests that losing 1 to 1.5 pounds per week is a healthy, achievable weight loss ‘rate’ within an effective diet and exercise program. In this case, my goal to lose 3.75 pounds per week is overly ambitious as compared to research-based standards. The unfortunate consequences of this might be that perhaps I had engaged in a very effective weight loss program of diet and exercise and was losing 1.5 pounds per week, but didn’t recognize and appreciate my success because my goal was unrealistic. I might feel failure instead of success and I might change to a effective weight loss strategy or even attribute my incorrectly perceived lack of success to a metabolic condition. It would make more sense for me to set a goal to lose 1 to 1.5 pounds per week until I reach my healthy weight. The same types of errors in decision-making can occur when we set overly ambitious goals for students (e.g., we may discontinue an effective intervention or suspect that a child has a learning disability).

Understanding average and ‘catch up’ rates of improvement (ROI) is very helpful in setting reasonable and ambitious goals. For students receiving effective core instruction and targeted, evidence-based intervention, the expectation is that they will make stronger than average growth. A reasonable ambitious growth rate might be a 75 percentile rate of improvement. That is somewhere between average (50 percentile), and rarely ever achieved (99 percentile). The FastBridge progress monitoring system is designed to ‘default’ to these reasonable but ambitious goals.

For example, for CBMreading the default rate of improvement in the progress monitoring set up menu is 1.5 words per week growth. If students achieve 1.5 words per week in grades 1-3 they will be making growth somewhere near the 75 percentile (see table below). That is, their rates of improvement would be stronger than the average student in their grade, but the goal rate is not so ambitious that few students would ever achieve it. The careful observer will see that the default goal of 1.5 words per week is sometimes somewhat above or below the 75 percentile. Educators can adjust the growth rate for an individual student based on the actual 75 percentile for that grade/measure or based on the intensity of the intervention provided.

Beyond third grade, a 1.5 word per week goal is at or above the 90 percentile. At these higher grade levels, average rates of improvement tend to decline, in part because many students at the grade level are already reading at a fairly high rate of automaticity and there is an upper limit to how fast a person can and should read. For older students lacking automaticity but getting substantial targeted intervention, more ambitious goals may make sense.

FAST CBMreading ROI at Specific Percentile Ranks

An interesting observation of rate of improvement norms is their relative universality. For example, growth norms for AIMSweb (a CBM product similar to FastBridge) are very similar to FastBridge growth norms, despite a different norming population with a different set of graded passages (See table below). The table below also provides recommendations by Fuchs, Fuchs, Hamlett, Walz and Germann (1993) that were the basis of FastBridge defaults. Although the 1.5 word per week improvement for CBMReading fits with prior research, some default goals in the FastBridge system are set to be far more ambitious.

The table below juxtaposes default ROIs in the FastBridge progress monitoring set up with aggregate ROIs in the FastBridge norms tables. For example, according to FBL norms, in second grade, a 50 percentile ROI for CBMreading is 1.3 words per week growth and a realistic/somewhat ambitious catch up goal (75 percentile growth) would be 1.6 words per week. AIMSweb norms are very similar at 1.2 (50 percentile growth) and 1.5 (75 percentile growth), respectively. These ROIs are similar to findings by Fuchs et al. in which second graders made on average 1.46 words per week growth. As students progress through grades however, average rates of improvements tend to decline across measures. Average ROIs for FastBridge and AIMSweb in grade four are .98 and .86 words per week growth respectively. Fourth grade students in the Fuchs et al. study made .84 words per week growth.

Comparison of FAST and AIMSweb ROI at Different Percentile Ranks for Letter Sounds and Nonsense Words

*K Nonsense words (FAST and AIMSweb) and K Letter Sounds (AIMSweb) are calculated Winter to Spring. FAST Letter Sounds First Grade are calculated Fall to Winter.

**Nonsense words in FAST are scored by word (with no partial credit). Nonsense words in AIMSweb are scored by sound (with partial credit).

Comparison of FAST, AIMSweb, and Fuchs et al. ROI at Different Percentile Ranks for Oral Reading Fluency

*AIMSweb growth rates presented in the table are for students performing in the average range (between the 25th and 75th percentile on the fall benchmark).

**All grade 1 ROI calculations are based on winter to spring norms because such data are not collected uniformly in the fall of first grade.

Other Considerations When Setting Goals

One advantage of rate of improvement goals is that at any given time a student’s current growth can be compared to the ROI goal. When we set norm-referenced or criterion-referenced goals, we typically identify a number at the end of the progress monitoring schedule (e.g. in the spring). The goal only makes sense on that date. We have to look at the current rate of improvement anyway, to see if the student is on a trajectory to meet that goal.

The FastBridge norms tables provide percentile rankings for rates of growth based on the national aggregate sample of scores. Simply go to the norms tables (CBMreading for 2 grade in this example), find the measure, grade level and identify aggregate growth that corresponds with the 75 percentile (1.63 in the example below).

Educators using the FastBridge progress monitoring system can adjust default goals (e.g., 1.5 words per week growth for CBMReading) to correspond with 75 percentile rates of improvement for a given measure and grade level for a more precise, reasonable and ambitious goal. When the weekly gain is adjusted, the corresponding end of year ‘Goal’ is also adjusted and can be compared to the ‘Benchmark’ score that indicates a low risk status.

With the advent of rate of improvement or ‘growth’ norms, educators are able to set realistic and ambitious goals based on the progress monitoring measures they are using at a particular grade. When students achieve a 75 percentile rate of improvement relative to average students at that grade, they will usually catch up. Maybe not this year, but eventually. Rates of improvement norms provide data that may help prevent educators from setting inadequate goals that increase gaps in achievement, or overly ambitious goals that lead to bad decision-making.

References

AIMSweb ROI Growth Norms (2017, January 11). Retrieved from

http://www.fastbridge.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/ROI_Norm_Tables1.pdf

Fuchs,L.S., Fuchs, D., Hamlett, C. L., Walz, L. Germann, G. (1993). Formative Evaluation of Academic Progress: How Much Growth Can We Expect? 22, pp. 27 – 48.

Zales LabCreated Emerald Birthstone Cross Pendant in 10K Gold fGQccpm
Angara Three Stone Ruby and Diamond Ring in 14K White Gold e6Bhik1gM
Michael Aram Butterfly Ginkgo Silver amp; Gold Pendant Necklace w/ Diamonds IZodZ
Angara Three Stone Sapphire and Diamond Ring in Platinum 9u6drdBXr
Share This
Related Posts

The Importance of Growth Data

自定义搜索

Judo World Federation President Marius Vizer has given green light to Kosovar judokas to attend Judo World Masters 2017 competition to be held next weekend in St. Petersburg, Russia, following the request of the Russian state that Kosovo should not be represented by state symbols.

Russia’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs asked Kosovo’s Judo Federation (KJF) for their contestants Distria Krasniqi and Nora Gjakova, to not be represented under the Kosovo flag in the tournament, but instead the flag of the International Judo Federation (IJF).

This is due to the fact that Russia does not recognize Kosovo’s independence because of their strong ties with Serbia.

AdChoices
广告
inRead invented by Teads

This request made by Russian officials was rejected by Kosovo’s Judo Federation, followed by the KJF announcing that they would boycott the competition.

Express contacted the President of the IJF, Marius Vizer, who was not available to speak due to work commitments, however representatives from his office informed Express that he is working on the issue.

After much speculation, Kosovo judo coach confirmed today on his Facebook account, that Kosovo will participate in the competition, and will be represented under their flag.

Kuka wrote in a Facebook post revealing that “this morning in a phone call between our friend Marius Vizer, President of IJF and Chairman of KJF Agron Kuka we were able to confirm that Kosovo will participate in the Judo World Masters in St. Petersburg!”

Kuka continued his post by commemorating President Vizer for his efforts to ensure that Kosovo will be represented equally amongst other countries in the competition, and also thanked other countries for their support in Kosovo’s fight for equal representation.

“Sports are breaking barriers, and in absence of Kosovo’s best judoka, Majlinda Kelmendi, Kosovo will represented by Nora Gjakova and Distria Krasniqi,” concluded Kuka.

Kelmendi won Kosovo’s first gold medal in the 2016 Olympics in the judo competition, however she will not be participating due to injury.

Date: 10 December 2017 15:51
Author: Jakob Weizman
ADVERTISEMENT

Kosovo, Serbia police meet on investigation of Ivanovic’s murder 0

Visa liberalisation for Kosovo depends from political will, Haradinaj says 0

Kosovo Foreign Ministry takes measures to counter Serbia’s aggressive campaign 0

Kosovo education system needs restructuring, says Apostolova 0

Read more

Ky website kontrollohet dhe menaxhohet nga Media Works. Të gjitha materialet , përfshirë fotografitë, janë të mbrojtura me të drejta autoriale të Media Works. Materialet janë për shfrytëzimin personal tuajin dhe për qëllime jo-komerciale. Ato nuk mund të kopjohen, riprodhohen, ripublikohen, modifikohen, transmetohen, ose distribuohen në çfarëdo mënyre, pa lejen paraprake të Gazetës Express. Shfrytëzimi i materialeve nga ndonjë website ose medium tjetër, pa lejen e Gazetës Express, është shkelje e drejtave autoriale dhe është i ndaluar, sipas dispozitave ligjore në fuqi.

Angara Emerald Ring PearShaped GIA Certified Emerald Halo Split Shank Ring twThUN6

This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website Larkspur amp; Hawk Sadie Bubble Riviere Necklace in MultiRiverstone Foil P8VkmNu

Cookie Consent plugin for the EU cookie law
Walters Faith Quentin 18K Diamond Hexagon Cigar Band Silver JdGwTiI6c2
Back

Men

Boys

Women

Girls

Africa

Men

Boys

Women

Girls

Americas

Men

Boys

Women

Girls

Men

Boys

Women

Girls

Europe

Men

Boys

Women

Girls

Oceania

Men

Boys

Women

Girls

All Events

Pro Season

National Teams

FIBA World Rankings presented by NIKE

3x3 Rankings

Other Leagues:

A

B

C

D

E

F

G

H

I

J

K

L

M

N

P

Q

R

S

T

U

V

Y

Z

Organisation

Overview

Structure

Regions

FIBA Family

Media Marketing

Basketball

Official Basketball Rules

FIBA Men's National Team Competition System

FIBA Women's National Team Competition

Overview

Activities Services

National Federations

I AM A

Event Host

Equipment Venue

Anti-Doping Health

Basketball Arbitral Tribunal

Foundation

Foundation

Hall of Fame

House of Basketball

Others

Other Inside FIBA Sections

Media Centre

Document Library

Search for ‘’

We noticed you might have connected from %continentName%. Do you want to see the FIBA Basketball World Cup 2019 African Qualifiers website?

FIBA Basketball World Cup 2019 African Qualifiers
Go to the African Qualifiers website
No Thanks

We noticed you might have connected from %continentName%. Do you want to see the FIBA Basketball World Cup 2019 Asian Qualifiers website?

Management Training and Leadership Training, Online

About Mind Tools

Privacy and Cookies

Corporate Solutions

Club Membership

Store

Newsletter

Accessibility

© Mind Tools Ltd, 1996-2018. All rights reserved. "Mind Tools" is a registered trademark of Mind Tools Ltd. Click here for permissions information.